21. January 2009 by Jennifer Dunn Saunders.

I wanted to point you all over to the Frustration Contest at one of my favorite sites, FreelanceWriterville.com.   Now, this contest doesn’t offer fame and glory (unless you count at $10 Amazon Gift Card), but it’s free to enter, has a 300 word limit, and deals with something we all know a great deal about — frustrating episodes in our freelance writing careers. So go let your frustrations out and maybe earn a little something extra for your trouble!

Posted in Uncategorized | Print | No Comments »

20. January 2009 by Jennifer Dunn Saunders.

After my last post about the Flesch-Kincaid Test and how it quantifies writing to a worrying degree, my online book club weekly selection just happened to be Super Crunchers by Ian Ayres.

The way the book club works (a few pages per day), I’ve only read about 5 pages of it so far, but the premise of the book is that mathematical forumlas has come so far that it can quantify just about anything, and it cites web applications like eHarmony and the recommendation systems of Netflix and Amazon as examples.  I’m waiting with interest for tomorrow’s bit to see if Ayres can convince me. (Not that I know enough about math to ever come to an informed conclusion.)

While I’m on the subject, I  really should rave about my book club. I’ve been a member for years and haven’t done it justice by recommending it far and wide. I’ll get on that soon. Until then, Happy Inauguration Day! 

Posted in Uncategorized | Print | No Comments »

15. January 2009 by Jennifer Dunn Saunders.

In last week’s New Yorker, Jill Lepore had an article called “The Speech.”  While the article was mostly about how the majority of inaugural addresses suck aren’t very memorable, she touched on something called the Flesch-Kincaid Readability Test.  You may have seen this sucker floating around on the ‘net at one time or another, but to sum it up, the Flesch calculator is intended to calculate at what grade level a text reads. (And no I’m not giving you a link so you can test your stuff until the bottom of the post. I know you. Keep reading!)  The Flesch takes factors like average number of words in a sentence, sentence length, syllables in words, etc. and, for us writers, supposedly tells us what grade level our work is meant for.

And it drives me crazy. 

Who died and said that writing a bazillion word sentence with supercalifragilisticexpialidocious shoehorned in three times makes your writing more worthwhile than someone who writes in a clear, concise, readable style?

Let’s consider this excerpt from anthropology. I won’t say I hate most anthropology writing, only that I’m horribly disappointed in it. (Oh, who am I kidding? I despise most anthropology writing like a bride despises the husband she caught cheating on their wedding night. Clearly, this stems from a semester of graduate study toward an anthropology degree.) But I digress. The below text is taken from an abstract of an anthropology paper. No, not the paper itself. The summary.

“The author begins by locating the thesis in the corpus of anthropological literature which acknowledges human suffering and refuses to adopt a position of cultural relativism. The complex and elusive phenomenon of structural violence is unpacked, followed by a description of the setting and the author’s methodology. Clinical observations are presented as contextualised narratives located around three themes: alcohol misuse; gendered violence; and inter-generational violence.” (Roberts, Anthropology & Medicine, 2009.)

This bad boy scores a 21 on the Flesch scale. As high school grads would read on a 12^th grade level, and people with Bachelor’s degrees on a 16^th grade level, I can only assume that this is meant for someone in the eleventybajillionth grade. (Darn, even with that awesomely long word, this paragraph only reads on a 9^th grade level.)

My point is that just because a document is long and full of fifty cent words it isn’t automatically worth more than say, a joke, or a slogan, or a song lyric that gets to the heart of a matter in a few words.  Regular people deserve to understand inaugural addresses, mortgages, and diagnoses. And the subjects of anthropological study damn sure deserve to understand what is being written about them by outsiders. At the risk of sounding like a raging populist, I find it disingenuous (50 cent word alert!) that certain writers try to preserve knowledge for themselves by holding it hostage with polysyllabic shackles.

I want to end with a couple of Flesch grade level scores:

“I have heard the mermaids singing, each to each. I do not think that they will sing to me.” – T.S. Eliot, The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock.  (1^st grade)

“Frankly, my dear, I don’t give a damn.” (Kindergarten)

And here’s the link to the Flesch calculator I was using. Try not to tear your hair out. (This post? 8^th grade.)

Posted in Writing Craft, Ethics | Print | 14 Comments »

8. January 2009 by Jennifer Dunn Saunders.

To the author of this advertisement:

 Theology Essay Help. I am looking for help with an essay (Old Testament prophet) The writer must be able to work with the Harvard referencing  system.  Good communication is essential and the courtesy to give an honest answer as to if or not you can genuinley take on this project is vital.

Seriously? You are looking for someone else to write your theology essay? I especially enjoy the part where you, the cheater, wants to hire “honest” people. 

Posted in Ethics, Freelance Writing | Print | 3 Comments »